Consider Image Processing Type in Mammography When Detecting Cancers
The type of imaging processing used in digital mammography has an impact on detection of calcification clusters.
Image processing has a significant impact on the detection of calcification clusters in digital mammography, according to an article published in the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Researchers from the United Kingdom, United States and Belgium performed a retrospective observer study to investigate the effect of image processing on the detection of cancers using digital mammography images.
The researchers collected 270 pairs of breast images, one view each of both breasts, from 238 patients with pathology-proven breast cancer; 185 women had presented for screening and 53 women presented with symptoms of cancer. Seven experienced observers inspected the images, locating and rating regions they suspected to be cancer for likelihood of malignancy.
The breast images were processed with three types of image processing: standard (full enhancement), low contrast (intermediate enhancement) and pseudo–film-screen (no enhancement).
Findings:
An expert radiologist selected 80 cases with malignant noncalcification lesions, such as mass, architectural distortion or asymmetric density. These cases had lesion conspicuity that was subtle or very subtle but still detectable. A total of 83 noncalcifications were detected. One patient had bilateral cancer with noncalcification cancers in both breasts.
The images of 52 other patients with biopsy-proven benign lesions were also inspected and the lesion locations were marked. Thirty patients from this group of 52 were randomly selected for the study. Their images showed a mixture of calcification and noncalcification lesions with a mixture of conspicuities.
The results showed that detection of calcification clusters was significantly affected by the type of image processing. “The JAFROC figure of merit (FOM) decreased from 0.65 with standard image processing to 0.63 with low-contrast image processing (p = 0.04) and from 0.65 with standard image processing to 0.61 with film-screen image processing (p = 0.0005),” the authors wrote. “The detection of noncalcification cancers was not significantly different among the image-processing types investigated (p > 0.40).”
The researchers concluded that the standard image processing showed the best results when looking for calcification clusters and they suggest that the effect on cancer detection should be considered when selecting the type of image processing in the future.
AI-Initiated Recalls After Screening Mammography Demonstrate Higher PPV for Breast Cancer
March 18th 2025While recalls initiated by one of two reviewing radiologists after screening mammography were nearly 10 percent higher than recalls initiated by an AI software, the AI-initiated recalls had an 85 percent higher positive predictive value for breast cancer, according to a new study.
ECR Mammography Study: Pre-Op CEM Detects 34 Percent More Multifocal Masses than Mammography
February 28th 2025In addition to contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) demonstrating over a 90 percent detection rate for multifocal masses, researchers found that no significant difference between histological measurements and CEM, according to study findings presented at the European Congress of Radiology.
Study: Mammography AI Leads to 29 Percent Increase in Breast Cancer Detection
February 5th 2025Use of the mammography AI software had a nearly equivalent false positive rate as unassisted radiologist interpretation and resulted in a 44 percent reduction in screen reading workload, according to findings from a randomized controlled trial involving over 105,000 women.
