As long as the Powers That Be continue to rule that all cases are created equal, and that a normal CT which gets read in three minutes is to be reimbursed identically with a train-wreck CT that takes half an hour and bears a boatload more liability, this will continue to happen.
It’s been a good day. You’re chugging along, slightly ahead of schedule, and will be able to leave work on time or even slightly early (and if such aren’t your metrics, you’re on track to exceed your daily productivity quota and perhaps generate some bonus dollars).
You put up what should be one of your last few studies. Ugh, what a mess.
Not a single thing looks to be normal. Nothing’s rip-roaring, get-on-the-phone-immediately bad, but you’re not going to be dictating the word “unremarkable” during this report. Everything’s either postsurgical, an anatomic variant that needs commenting, and/or contains lesions.
This is one of those studies which will need numerous measurements and considerable research - and even then, you can tell you won’t be able to offer a definitive diagnosis. It’ll take several times longer to interpret than anything else you’ve done today. Proceed to read it, and you can forget all about the happy thoughts mentioned in the first paragraph.
Now, I know that you, dear reader, and I, along with most of our esteemed colleagues, would do the honorable thing here: Grit teeth, hunker down, and muscle on through. But we’ve all encountered folks who would, shall we say, exercise the better part of valor. Such maneuvers bear colorful metaphors for nicknames: Dumping (when leaving an ugly case in someone else’s workload), cherry-picking (when sifting through cases for easy, quick reads), etc.
As long as the Powers That Be continue to rule that all cases are created equal, and that a normal CT which gets read in three minutes is to be reimbursed identically with a train-wreck CT that takes half an hour and bears a boatload more liability, this will continue to happen.
One does have to admire the cleverness of the cherry-pickers. Unlike the reams of radiological and medical knowledge that we have all systematically been taught, they have had little or no tutelage in how to avoid the tough cases; they generally learned these tricks all on their own.
I daresay not a single radiology residency (or conference, for those out of training) offers a lecture, let alone a series, on these particular skills. Such instruction is even more forsaken than those elusive talks purportedly given on Business Aspects of Radiology, for instance, or How to Survive in Private Practice. Negotiating Your Contract and What to Look for in a Partnership are other such rare birds.
For those who have always wished they could answer their teammates’ cherry-picking in kind, then, I offer my view of some of the more successful (or at least innovative) methods I have seen. To spoilsports who would accuse me of pouring gasoline on the fire by doing so, let me suggest that awareness of some of these ploys might assist in counteracting them. And if that doesn’t satisfy, well, ya can’t please everybody.
Part 2 of On Cherry-picking will be in a forthcoming blog.
New Study Examines Short-Term Consistency of Large Language Models in Radiology
November 22nd 2024While GPT-4 demonstrated higher overall accuracy than other large language models in answering ACR Diagnostic in Training Exam multiple-choice questions, researchers noted an eight percent decrease in GPT-4’s accuracy rate from the first month to the third month of the study.
FDA Grants Expanded 510(k) Clearance for Xenoview 3T MRI Chest Coil in GE HealthCare MRI Platforms
November 21st 2024Utilized in conjunction with hyperpolarized Xenon-129 for the assessment of lung ventilation, the chest coil can now be employed in the Signa Premier and Discovery MR750 3T MRI systems.
FDA Clears AI-Powered Ultrasound Software for Cardiac Amyloidosis Detection
November 20th 2024The AI-enabled EchoGo® Amyloidosis software for echocardiography has reportedly demonstrated an 84.5 percent sensitivity rate for diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis in heart failure patients 65 years of age and older.