Screening mammograms enhanced by CAD trigger more false alarms than non-CAD screenings and detect more early cancers that may never have needed treatment.
Mammograms enhanced with computer-aided detection (CAD) programs are detecting more noninvasive and early-stage breast cancers, but are also causing more false alarms, according to a study in the Annals of Internal Medicine.
As use of CAD during screening mammography has increased among Medicare beneficiaries, so has the diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and the incidence of diagnostic testing among women who do not have breast cancer.
“DCIS progresses slowly, if at all. Some of these early noninvasive lesions may never have come to clinical attention in women’s lifetimes if CAD were not applied to their mammograms,” lead author Joshua Fenton, MD, MPH, said in a release.
Fenton and his colleagues from the University of California Davis Health System undertook a retrospective cohort study of Medicare enrollees to determine associations between use of CAD with mammography and the incidence of invasive breast cancer, and invasive cancer stage and resultant diagnostic testing.
The researchers assessed 409,459 mammograms from 163,099 women, aged 67 to 89, who underwent screening between 2001 and 2006. The researchers were looking for incidences of DCIS and invasive breast cancer within one year of the mammography, as well as invasive cancer stage and any diagnostic testing performed within 90 days of the screening among the women who did not have breast cancer.
Researchers found that women whose screening included CAD had a 17 percent increase in the diagnosis of DCIS breast lesions and a 6 percent increase in diagnosis of early-stage invasive breast cancer. However, there was also a 19 percent increase in diagnostic mammography and breast ultrasonography after initial screening and a 10 percent increase in breast biopsies.
“CAD is expensive technology that has been nearly universally adopted in the U.S. due to Medicare’s support and the hope that it can help us identify and treat invasive breast cancer early,” Fenton says. “Our study suggests that we still don’t know whether the benefits outweigh the harms for the average woman on Medicare.”
AI-Initiated Recalls After Screening Mammography Demonstrate Higher PPV for Breast Cancer
March 18th 2025While recalls initiated by one of two reviewing radiologists after screening mammography were nearly 10 percent higher than recalls initiated by an AI software, the AI-initiated recalls had an 85 percent higher positive predictive value for breast cancer, according to a new study.
ECR Mammography Study: Pre-Op CEM Detects 34 Percent More Multifocal Masses than Mammography
February 28th 2025In addition to contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) demonstrating over a 90 percent detection rate for multifocal masses, researchers found that no significant difference between histological measurements and CEM, according to study findings presented at the European Congress of Radiology.
Study: Mammography AI Leads to 29 Percent Increase in Breast Cancer Detection
February 5th 2025Use of the mammography AI software had a nearly equivalent false positive rate as unassisted radiologist interpretation and resulted in a 44 percent reduction in screen reading workload, according to findings from a randomized controlled trial involving over 105,000 women.