The reason for performing a breast MRI should be taken into consideration when assessing performance measures.
Performance measures for breast MRI vary significantly for screening and diagnostic examinations, according to a study published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.
Researchers from Massachusetts, Delaware and Texas sought to evaluate breast MRI performance measures from a single academic institution, stratified by screening and diagnostic indications. They performed a retrospective search of the institution’s breast imaging database and found 2,444 breast MRIs from April 1, 2007 to March 31, 2008 that could be included in the study.
A total of 1,313 of the examinations were for screening, with the most common reason being personal and family histories of breast cancer; 1,131 examinations were for diagnostic indications.
The researchers assigned an overall BI-RADS assessment to each study, according to the most actionable BI-RADS lesion category. Cancer detection rate, positive predictive value (PPV) and abnormal interpretation rates were calculated.
The results showed that cancer detection rates were 14 per 1,000 screening breast MRI examinations and 47 per 1,000 diagnostic examinations, while the abnormal interpretation rate was 12 percent (152 of 1,313) for screening and 17 percent (194 of 1,131) for diagnostic indications.
The positive predictive values were lower for screening than for diagnostic indications:
The researchers concluded that the performance of breast MRI measures differ significantly between indications and that medical audits should take this into consideration, calculating performance measurements for screening and diagnostics separately.
FDA Grants Expanded 510(k) Clearance for Xenoview 3T MRI Chest Coil in GE HealthCare MRI Platforms
November 21st 2024Utilized in conjunction with hyperpolarized Xenon-129 for the assessment of lung ventilation, the chest coil can now be employed in the Signa Premier and Discovery MR750 3T MRI systems.
New Study Examines Agreement Between Radiologists and Referring Clinicians on Follow-Up Imaging
November 18th 2024Agreement on follow-up imaging was 41 percent more likely with recommendations by thoracic radiologists and 36 percent less likely on recommendations for follow-up nuclear imaging, according to new research.