• AI
  • Molecular Imaging
  • CT
  • X-Ray
  • Ultrasound
  • MRI
  • Facility Management
  • Mammography

Breast MRI Performance Differs if Screening, Diagnostic

Article

The reason for performing a breast MRI should be taken into consideration when assessing performance measures.

Performance measures for breast MRI vary significantly for screening and diagnostic examinations, according to a study published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology.

Researchers from Massachusetts, Delaware and Texas sought to evaluate breast MRI performance measures from a single academic institution, stratified by screening and diagnostic indications. They performed a retrospective search of the institution’s breast imaging database and found 2,444 breast MRIs from April 1, 2007 to March 31, 2008 that could be included in the study.

A total of 1,313 of the examinations were for screening, with the most common reason being personal and family histories of breast cancer; 1,131 examinations were for diagnostic indications.

The researchers assigned an overall BI-RADS assessment to each study, according to the most actionable BI-RADS lesion category. Cancer detection rate, positive predictive value (PPV) and abnormal interpretation rates were calculated.

The results showed that cancer detection rates were 14 per 1,000 screening breast MRI examinations and 47 per 1,000 diagnostic examinations, while the abnormal interpretation rate was 12 percent (152 of 1,313) for screening and 17 percent (194 of 1,131) for diagnostic indications.

The positive predictive values were lower for screening than for diagnostic indications:

 
Screening
Diagnostic
PPV1 – abnormal findings
12%
28%
PPV2 – biopsy recommended
24%
36%
PPV3 – biopsy performed
27%
38%

The researchers concluded that the performance of breast MRI measures differ significantly between indications and that medical audits should take this into consideration, calculating performance measurements for screening and diagnostics separately.

Recent Videos
Radiology Study Finds Increasing Rates of Non-Physician Practitioner Image Interpretation in Office Settings
Addressing the Early Impact of National Breast Density Notification for Mammography Reports
Where the USPSTF Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations Fall Short: An Interview with Stacy Smith-Foley, MD
A Closer Look at MRI-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
Improving the Quality of Breast MRI Acquisition and Processing
Can Diffusion Microstructural Imaging Provide Insights into Long Covid Beyond Conventional MRI?
Emerging MRI and PET Research Reveals Link Between Visceral Abdominal Fat and Early Signs of Alzheimer’s Disease
Nina Kottler, MD, MS
Practical Insights on CT and MRI Neuroimaging and Reporting for Stroke Patients
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.