Increasing use of clinical 3T MR imaging has prompted the American College of Radiology to tweak its accreditation process to include the higher field strength magnets.
Increasing use of clinical 3T MR imaging has prompted the American College of Radiology to tweak its accreditation process to include the higher field strength magnets.
The college began to evaluate 3T magnets last summer. It spent a year gathering data from sites using 3T magnets to ensure consistency in the accreditation process, according to Leonard Lucey, senior director for nonbreast imaging accreditation programs.
"More and more accredited sites are switching from 1.5T to 3T. We're responding to our members' needs," Lucey said.
The accreditation process for 3T scanners is under the same program as 0.5T and 1.5T machines. The phantom was primarily set up for the lower strength scanners, however, and the physics for 3T are much different. Therefore, physicists had to make minor adjustments in the testing criteria so sites could use the same phantom. A phantom costs $730.
The move to include 3T in the MR accreditation process comes at a time when third-party payers increasingly require sites to be accredited in order to get paid. Several states require accreditation as well, and Congress is investigating whether it should enact national quality standards for performing and interpreting outpatient diagnostic imaging covered by Medicare.
In another move, the ACR recently discontinued its radiography/fluoroscopy accreditation program, which started three years ago. The interest in it has been less than anticipated, Lucey said. The accreditation process for radiography and fluoroscopy is labor-intensive and takes many resources. Coupled with the fact that no third-party payers require such accreditation, the program just didn't take off.
The challenge for the future will be devising accreditation programs for niche imaging such as breast MR, according to Lucey. Current MR accreditation is for whole body. Facilities are required to send images of the brain, abdomen, and periphery.
"We'll have to decide how something like breast MR will fit into our program, or if we need to design a new program," he said.
For more information from the Diagnostic Imaging archives:
Establishing M.D. imaging credentials tops ACR tasks
Insurer in Pennsylvania limits specialty-run imaging
Can Generative AI Facilitate Simulated Contrast Enhancement for Prostate MRI?
January 14th 2025Deep learning synthesis of contrast-enhanced MRI from non-contrast prostate MRI sequences provided an average multiscale structural similarity index of 70 percent with actual contrast-enhanced prostate MRI in external validation testing from newly published research.
Can MRI Have an Impact with Fertility-Sparing Treatments for Endometrial and Cervical Cancers?
January 9th 2025In a literature review that includes insights from recently issued guidelines from multiple European medical societies, researchers discuss the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in facilitating appropriate patient selection for fertility-sparing treatments to address early-stage endometrial and cervical cancer.
Surveillance Breast MRI Associated with Lower Risks of Advanced Second Breast Cancers
January 8th 2025After propensity score matching in a study of over 3,000 women with a personal history of breast cancer, researchers found that surveillance breast MRI facilitated a 59 percent lower risk in advanced presentations of second breast cancers.
New Survey Explores Radiologist and Neurologist Comfort Level with AI Triage for Brain MRI
January 7th 2025Survey results revealed that 71 percent of clinicians preferred adjunctive AI in facilitating triage of brain MRI scans and 58 percent were comfortable utilizing AI triage without input from radiologists.