Video: How To Handle Incidental Findings, Without Risk
CHICAGO - As the number of CT scans done in the US has climbed, so has the number of incidental findings - and the related malpractice risks for radiologists. Leonard Berlin, MD, in an interview on malpractice risk at RSNA 2011, says the right path isn't clear.
As the number of CT scans done in the US has climbed, so has the number of incidental findings - and the related malpractice risks for radiologists.
If, while reviewing an image of a lung, you happen to spy a possibly cancer on a kidney, do you ignore it and open yourself to a malpractice trial down the road if it turns out to be something? Do you obey the law of probability or look out for each individual patient?
Most incidentals, fully 99 percent, turn out to be meaningless. Drawing attention to them simply adds cost to the system and forces the patient to undergo possibly unnecessary tests and further radiation.
On the flip side, for any individual patient, ignoring the incidental could mean a disease goes un-diagnosed too long.
As Leonard Berlin, MD, put it in an interview on malpractice risk at RSNA 2011, patients don’t want to hear about statistics. They only care about their own bodies.
The appropriate choice for radiologists, he summarized, simply isn’t clear.
Study Explores Impact of Insurance on Treatment and Referrals for Patients with Uterine Fibroids
February 19th 2025Women with uterine fibroids and Medicaid coverage are significantly more likely to be treated with uterine artery embolization than those with commercial insurance, according to newly published research.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
