CMS recently extended to Oct. 6 the application deadline for hospitals interested in testing the first of four bundled payment models. It will be a while until you find out while which system the agency ultimately chooses, but this is certain - you will be affected.
CMS recently extended to Oct. 6 the application deadline for hospitals interested in testing the first of four bundled payment models. It will be a while until you find out while which system the agency ultimately chooses, but this is certain - you will be affected.
Three models are retrospective bundling systems, and the fourth is prospective. Even if your hospital isn’t a testing ground, knowing the basics of each model could save you future confusion.
Model 1: This model defines an episode-of-care as an inpatient stay in the general acute-care hospital. CMS would reimburse you for your services separately under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, and hospitals would receive a discounted payment based on Inpatient Prospective Payment System payment rates. If any gains from improved coordination of care occur, hospitals and providers would share them.
Model 2: As with Model 1, Model 2 includes the inpatient stay, but it would also encompass post-acute care ending at either 30 or 90 days after discharge. Medicare would pay a lump payment for your services in post-acute provider care, related readmissions, and other services, such as durable medical equipment, clinical lab services, prosthetics, Part B drugs, etc. To get a target price, Medicare would discount an amount based on the fee-for-service payments you usually receive for the episode. Payments would be doled out at these normal fee-for-service rates, and Medicare would reconcile them against the target price.
Model 3: This model mirrors Model 2 except episodes-of-care begin at inpatient-stay discharge and ends no sooner than 30-days post-discharge.
Model 4: With this prospective payment model, CMS would make a single, bundled payment to the hospital. It encompasses all inpatient-stay services provided by the hospital and all providers. You would be required to submit “no-pay” claims to Medicare, and the hospital would reimburse you out of its overall bundled payment.
Study Reaffirms Low Risk for csPCa with Biopsy Omission After Negative Prostate MRI
December 19th 2024In a new study involving nearly 600 biopsy-naïve men, researchers found that only 4 percent of those with negative prostate MRI had clinically significant prostate cancer after three years of active monitoring.
Study Examines Impact of Deep Learning on Fast MRI Protocols for Knee Pain
December 17th 2024Ten-minute and five-minute knee MRI exams with compressed sequences facilitated by deep learning offered nearly equivalent sensitivity and specificity as an 18-minute conventional MRI knee exam, according to research presented recently at the RSNA conference.
Can Radiomics Bolster Low-Dose CT Prognostic Assessment for High-Risk Lung Adenocarcinoma?
December 16th 2024A CT-based radiomic model offered over 10 percent higher specificity and positive predictive value for high-risk lung adenocarcinoma in comparison to a radiographic model, according to external validation testing in a recent study.